Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT treated the alleged double addition in income computation, including the set-off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, as a connected computational error and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee. It also found the transfer pricing adjustment unsustainable because the retained comparables were functionally and product-wise dissimilar to the assessee's manufacturing activity, and held that the assessee's proposed comparables and depreciation policies had to be considered. The transfer pricing issue was likewise set aside and restored to the AO for reconsideration in accordance with law. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
