Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Documentary evidence supporting purchases, including invoices, e-way bills, bank records, KYC documents, transporter details, receipts, photographs and GST returns, was accepted as unrebutted because no discrepancy or fabrication was shown. The Tribunal held that mere suspicion that such material could be manufactured was insufficient, and that alleged bogus purchases and grey-market purchases must be tested on different parameters. Where documentary proof is produced, it can be displaced only by independent enquiry or material showing lower-price availability and inflation of bills. In the absence of such rebuttal, the estimated profit addition for alleged non-genuine purchases was unsustainable and deleted.
Documentary evidence supporting purchases, including invoices, e-way bills, bank records, KYC documents, transporter details, receipts, photographs and GST returns, was accepted as unrebutted because no discrepancy or fabrication was shown. The Tribunal held that mere suspicion that such material could be manufactured was insufficient, and that alleged bogus purchases and grey-market purchases must be tested on different parameters. Where documentary proof is produced, it can be displaced only by independent enquiry or material showing lower-price availability and inflation of bills. In the absence of such rebuttal, the estimated profit addition for alleged non-genuine purchases was unsustainable and deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.