Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
