Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
