Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
The adjustment of a corporate debtor's security deposit was treated as a pre-CIRP decision because the material showed approval before commencement of CIRP, with later billing entries viewed as consequential. The Tribunal rejected the allegation of a Section 14 moratorium breach and found no clear reconciliation proving wrongful appropriation of CIRP-period payments. It also held that the adjusted claim had been filed and accepted during CIRP, carried into the information memorandum and resolution plan, and could not be reopened after the plan was approved and implemented. Restoration of the amounts would impermissibly disturb settled commercial assumptions under the approved plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
