Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2541 to 2560 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a GST fake-input-tax-credit prosecution under Section 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act, the HC granted regular bail after noting that investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, charges had been framed, and the rival allegations were matters for trial. The Court also considered the petitioner's custody of about six months and the likelihood of a prolonged trial. On that basis, it found a case for bail while leaving the merits of the accusations to be decided at trial, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or Duty Magistrate.
In a GST fake-input-tax-credit prosecution under Section 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act, the HC granted regular bail after noting that investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, charges had been framed, and the rival allegations were matters for trial. The Court also considered the petitioner's custody of about six months and the likelihood of a prolonged trial. On that basis, it found a case for bail while leaving the merits of the accusations to be decided at trial, subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or Duty Magistrate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
