Limitation period commencement and procedural inquiry rules: identity-based limitation upheld; complaints by authorised public servants need not attra...
Pre-trial bail granted where custodial period, documentary prosecution, and magistrate-triable offence favor release subject to surety and no witness ...
Allowability of Salary Exemptions: Form 16 entries can substantiate HRA and other salary exemptions, and home loan interest is deductible for a self-o...
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the show cause notice and ex parte adjudication order, holding that the petitioner had already attempted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy and had made the required pre-deposit. As the appeal could not be uploaded on the portal because of a technical glitch, the Court directed the petitioner to file the appeal afresh under the proviso to Rule 108 of the CGST Rules, 2017, permitted all grounds to be raised before the appellate authority, and condoned the delay in filing. The writ petition was disposed of in favour of pursuing the statutory remedy.
The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the show cause notice and ex parte adjudication order, holding that the petitioner had already attempted to pursue the statutory appellate remedy and had made the required pre-deposit. As the appeal could not be uploaded on the portal because of a technical glitch, the Court directed the petitioner to file the appeal afresh under the proviso to Rule 108 of the CGST Rules, 2017, permitted all grounds to be raised before the appellate authority, and condoned the delay in filing. The writ petition was disposed of in favour of pursuing the statutory remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
