Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Vicarious criminal liability of directors under s. 276B requires material showing involvement in the company's day-to-day affairs. The Trial Court had discharged accused No. 6 on a common finding that there was no evidence of such involvement for accused Nos. 2 to 6, but that basis had already been set aside in earlier revision proceedings as to accused No. 2. The High Court held that the same common reasoning could not continue to sustain the discharge of accused No. 6, and set aside the discharge order. Liberty was reserved to the accused to establish before the Trial Court that no material exists showing participation in day-to-day management.
Vicarious criminal liability of directors under s. 276B requires material showing involvement in the company's day-to-day affairs. The Trial Court had discharged accused No. 6 on a common finding that there was no evidence of such involvement for accused Nos. 2 to 6, but that basis had already been set aside in earlier revision proceedings as to accused No. 2. The High Court held that the same common reasoning could not continue to sustain the discharge of accused No. 6, and set aside the discharge order. Liberty was reserved to the accused to establish before the Trial Court that no material exists showing participation in day-to-day management.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.