Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Voluntary contributions specifically earmarked for temple building construction and renovation were treated as corpus donations and therefore capital receipts. The Tribunal relied on donor lists, affidavits, receipts and audited accounts showing that the funds were received and applied for the stated construction purpose, and the Revenue did not rebut that material. It held that such earmarked corpus donations do not become taxable merely because the trust is unregistered under section 12A. Following prior ITAT authority, the addition for voluntary contributions was deleted as unsustainable.
Voluntary contributions specifically earmarked for temple building construction and renovation were treated as corpus donations and therefore capital receipts. The Tribunal relied on donor lists, affidavits, receipts and audited accounts showing that the funds were received and applied for the stated construction purpose, and the Revenue did not rebut that material. It held that such earmarked corpus donations do not become taxable merely because the trust is unregistered under section 12A. Following prior ITAT authority, the addition for voluntary contributions was deleted as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.