Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Voluntary contributions specifically earmarked for temple building construction and renovation were treated as corpus donations and therefore capital receipts. The Tribunal relied on donor lists, affidavits, receipts and audited accounts showing that the funds were received and applied for the stated construction purpose, and the Revenue did not rebut that material. It held that such earmarked corpus donations do not become taxable merely because the trust is unregistered under section 12A. Following prior ITAT authority, the addition for voluntary contributions was deleted as unsustainable.
Voluntary contributions specifically earmarked for temple building construction and renovation were treated as corpus donations and therefore capital receipts. The Tribunal relied on donor lists, affidavits, receipts and audited accounts showing that the funds were received and applied for the stated construction purpose, and the Revenue did not rebut that material. It held that such earmarked corpus donations do not become taxable merely because the trust is unregistered under section 12A. Following prior ITAT authority, the addition for voluntary contributions was deleted as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.