Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
A donation to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund made out of CSR expenditure remained eligible for deduction under section 80G, because the disallowance of CSR under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) operates only in computing business income, while Chapter VI-A deductions apply independently to gross total income. The Tribunal held that there was no statutory bar to claiming the section 80G deduction once the payment was made to an approved fund and the statutory conditions were met. The objection based on absence of voluntariness was rejected, as the assessee's choice of recipient was sufficient. The disallowance was deleted.
A donation to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund made out of CSR expenditure remained eligible for deduction under section 80G, because the disallowance of CSR under Explanation 2 to section 37(1) operates only in computing business income, while Chapter VI-A deductions apply independently to gross total income. The Tribunal held that there was no statutory bar to claiming the section 80G deduction once the payment was made to an approved fund and the statutory conditions were met. The objection based on absence of voluntariness was rejected, as the assessee's choice of recipient was sufficient. The disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.