Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not exigible on the addition relating to transfer of tenancy rights because the addition rested on the deeming fiction in section 50C, and the same reasoning used to delete penalty on the property transfer addition applied equally. Penalty was also deleted on the fixed deposit interest addition because the interest formed part of maturity proceeds, the investment was not disputed, and mere acceptance of the addition did not automatically establish concealment. The Tribunal held that each addition must be examined on its own facts before penalty can be imposed.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not exigible on the addition relating to transfer of tenancy rights because the addition rested on the deeming fiction in section 50C, and the same reasoning used to delete penalty on the property transfer addition applied equally. Penalty was also deleted on the fixed deposit interest addition because the interest formed part of maturity proceeds, the investment was not disputed, and mere acceptance of the addition did not automatically establish concealment. The Tribunal held that each addition must be examined on its own facts before penalty can be imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
