Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
At the stage of charge, the test is grave suspicion, not proof of conviction; applying that standard, the court found belated embellishments, material improvements, and weak medical corroboration insufficient to sustain prosecution against the officers, so discharge was upheld. It also held that CCTV footage was inadmissible without a Section 65B certificate, and the copied recording could not be relied on because its integrity was not properly proved. Once excluded, the electronic material did not support the allegation of illegal apprehension, and the limited scope of revision justified no interference with the Sessions Court's order.
At the stage of charge, the test is grave suspicion, not proof of conviction; applying that standard, the court found belated embellishments, material improvements, and weak medical corroboration insufficient to sustain prosecution against the officers, so discharge was upheld. It also held that CCTV footage was inadmissible without a Section 65B certificate, and the copied recording could not be relied on because its integrity was not properly proved. Once excluded, the electronic material did not support the allegation of illegal apprehension, and the limited scope of revision justified no interference with the Sessions Court's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
