Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
