Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
