Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Adverse material used to disallow exempt long-term capital gain on off-market share transactions had to be confronted to the assessee before assessment. The ITAT found the appellate relief unsustainable because the finding that notices and third-party responses had not been properly confronted was accepted without verifying the assessment record, and the precedents relied on concerned stock-exchange transactions rather than preferential allotment purchases. It also noted that the SEBI material referred to by the lower authorities was not placed on record. The additions were set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after supplying all relied-upon material, with all contentions kept open.
Adverse material used to disallow exempt long-term capital gain on off-market share transactions had to be confronted to the assessee before assessment. The ITAT found the appellate relief unsustainable because the finding that notices and third-party responses had not been properly confronted was accepted without verifying the assessment record, and the precedents relied on concerned stock-exchange transactions rather than preferential allotment purchases. It also noted that the SEBI material referred to by the lower authorities was not placed on record. The additions were set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after supplying all relied-upon material, with all contentions kept open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.