Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Adverse material used to disallow exempt long-term capital gain on off-market share transactions had to be confronted to the assessee before assessment. The ITAT found the appellate relief unsustainable because the finding that notices and third-party responses had not been properly confronted was accepted without verifying the assessment record, and the precedents relied on concerned stock-exchange transactions rather than preferential allotment purchases. It also noted that the SEBI material referred to by the lower authorities was not placed on record. The additions were set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after supplying all relied-upon material, with all contentions kept open.
Adverse material used to disallow exempt long-term capital gain on off-market share transactions had to be confronted to the assessee before assessment. The ITAT found the appellate relief unsustainable because the finding that notices and third-party responses had not been properly confronted was accepted without verifying the assessment record, and the precedents relied on concerned stock-exchange transactions rather than preferential allotment purchases. It also noted that the SEBI material referred to by the lower authorities was not placed on record. The additions were set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after supplying all relied-upon material, with all contentions kept open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.