Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
ITAT remanded the addition for alleged bogus purchases because the authorities had not first verified whether the disputed purchases were actually debited to the trading account or claimed as deduction; if they were not so claimed, the addition could not survive. The Tribunal also directed verification of the assessee's claim that genuine purchases from four parties existed and that the disputed amount had been reversed in the books. In contrast, a 50% disallowance of labour charges was sustained because the assessee produced only ledger entries and cash vouchers, without reliable evidence of the labourers' identity or other credible proof of expenditure.
ITAT remanded the addition for alleged bogus purchases because the authorities had not first verified whether the disputed purchases were actually debited to the trading account or claimed as deduction; if they were not so claimed, the addition could not survive. The Tribunal also directed verification of the assessee's claim that genuine purchases from four parties existed and that the disputed amount had been reversed in the books. In contrast, a 50% disallowance of labour charges was sustained because the assessee produced only ledger entries and cash vouchers, without reliable evidence of the labourers' identity or other credible proof of expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
