Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A show cause notice for cancellation of GST registration must disclose the precise default so the registrant can mount an effective reply. Here, the notice only referred to non-filing of returns for six months without identifying the relevant period, and the cancellation order failed to give specific reasons, making it a non-speaking order contrary to Rule 22(3), Form GST REG-19, and natural justice. The petitioner's failure to reply did not excuse the Proper Officer from passing a reasoned order. Despite delay in approaching the Court, the statutory defect in recording reasons prevailed. The cancellation order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the notice stage for fresh consideration.
A show cause notice for cancellation of GST registration must disclose the precise default so the registrant can mount an effective reply. Here, the notice only referred to non-filing of returns for six months without identifying the relevant period, and the cancellation order failed to give specific reasons, making it a non-speaking order contrary to Rule 22(3), Form GST REG-19, and natural justice. The petitioner's failure to reply did not excuse the Proper Officer from passing a reasoned order. Despite delay in approaching the Court, the statutory defect in recording reasons prevailed. The cancellation order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the notice stage for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
