Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cotton seed oil cake supplied as cattle feed was treated as falling within the exemption under Notification No. 02/2017, so GST was not leviable for the period in question. Following an earlier Coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, and noting that its applicability was not disputed, the Court held that the demand raised for non-payment of GST could not survive. The amount appropriated through DRC-03 against the demand was therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to refund. The impugned adjudication and appellate orders, together with the consequential DRC-07, were quashed and refund was directed.
Cotton seed oil cake supplied as cattle feed was treated as falling within the exemption under Notification No. 02/2017, so GST was not leviable for the period in question. Following an earlier Coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, and noting that its applicability was not disputed, the Court held that the demand raised for non-payment of GST could not survive. The amount appropriated through DRC-03 against the demand was therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to refund. The impugned adjudication and appellate orders, together with the consequential DRC-07, were quashed and refund was directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
