Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cotton seed oil cake supplied as cattle feed was treated as falling within the exemption under Notification No. 02/2017, so GST was not leviable for the period in question. Following an earlier Coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, and noting that its applicability was not disputed, the Court held that the demand raised for non-payment of GST could not survive. The amount appropriated through DRC-03 against the demand was therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to refund. The impugned adjudication and appellate orders, together with the consequential DRC-07, were quashed and refund was directed.
Cotton seed oil cake supplied as cattle feed was treated as falling within the exemption under Notification No. 02/2017, so GST was not leviable for the period in question. Following an earlier Coordinate Bench decision in an identical matter, and noting that its applicability was not disputed, the Court held that the demand raised for non-payment of GST could not survive. The amount appropriated through DRC-03 against the demand was therefore unsustainable, and the petitioner was entitled to refund. The impugned adjudication and appellate orders, together with the consequential DRC-07, were quashed and refund was directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.