Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.