Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2841 to 2860 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.