Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
The Tribunal held that the enhancement of the stamp duty valuation tolerance band from 5% to 10% was a curative, beneficial amendment applicable to A.Y. 2018-19, because it only relaxed the rigour of a deeming provision and did not create a new charge or fresh burden. It further held that the deeming fiction under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) could not be invoked where the difference between the purchase consideration and the stamp duty value was 7.44%, being within the 10% band. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.