Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Where an assessee disputes stamp duty value under Section 43CA and the matter is referred to the DVO, the DVO valuation substitutes the stamp duty value for testing the safe harbour tolerance band. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that in each impugned transaction the difference between the agreement value and the DVO valuation was below the prescribed 10% margin. As the variation remained within the permissible tolerance, the deeming fiction under Section 43CA could not be invoked and the addition could not survive; the addition was deleted.
Where an assessee disputes stamp duty value under Section 43CA and the matter is referred to the DVO, the DVO valuation substitutes the stamp duty value for testing the safe harbour tolerance band. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that in each impugned transaction the difference between the agreement value and the DVO valuation was below the prescribed 10% margin. As the variation remained within the permissible tolerance, the deeming fiction under Section 43CA could not be invoked and the addition could not survive; the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.