Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3001 to 3020 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an assessee disputes stamp duty value under Section 43CA and the matter is referred to the DVO, the DVO valuation substitutes the stamp duty value for testing the safe harbour tolerance band. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that in each impugned transaction the difference between the agreement value and the DVO valuation was below the prescribed 10% margin. As the variation remained within the permissible tolerance, the deeming fiction under Section 43CA could not be invoked and the addition could not survive; the addition was deleted.
Where an assessee disputes stamp duty value under Section 43CA and the matter is referred to the DVO, the DVO valuation substitutes the stamp duty value for testing the safe harbour tolerance band. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that in each impugned transaction the difference between the agreement value and the DVO valuation was below the prescribed 10% margin. As the variation remained within the permissible tolerance, the deeming fiction under Section 43CA could not be invoked and the addition could not survive; the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.