Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Preferential location charges collected for apartment bookings were held to form part of the composite supply of construction services, because choice of location is an integral element of that supply and construction is the principal supply attracting the same GST treatment. A later clarificatory circular issued under Section 168(1) was treated as binding on the authorities and, being clarificatory, applied retrospectively. The earlier advance ruling and appellate order treating such charges as separately taxable were therefore quashed, and the charges were held subject to the same GST treatment as construction services.
Preferential location charges collected for apartment bookings were held to form part of the composite supply of construction services, because choice of location is an integral element of that supply and construction is the principal supply attracting the same GST treatment. A later clarificatory circular issued under Section 168(1) was treated as binding on the authorities and, being clarificatory, applied retrospectively. The earlier advance ruling and appellate order treating such charges as separately taxable were therefore quashed, and the charges were held subject to the same GST treatment as construction services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.