Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Preferential location charges collected for apartment bookings were held to form part of the composite supply of construction services, because choice of location is an integral element of that supply and construction is the principal supply attracting the same GST treatment. A later clarificatory circular issued under Section 168(1) was treated as binding on the authorities and, being clarificatory, applied retrospectively. The earlier advance ruling and appellate order treating such charges as separately taxable were therefore quashed, and the charges were held subject to the same GST treatment as construction services.
Preferential location charges collected for apartment bookings were held to form part of the composite supply of construction services, because choice of location is an integral element of that supply and construction is the principal supply attracting the same GST treatment. A later clarificatory circular issued under Section 168(1) was treated as binding on the authorities and, being clarificatory, applied retrospectively. The earlier advance ruling and appellate order treating such charges as separately taxable were therefore quashed, and the charges were held subject to the same GST treatment as construction services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.