Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
