Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
