Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3001 to 3020 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Refund adjustment against a disputed tax demand was held unsustainable during pendency of the first appeal where the taxpayer had already deposited more than 50% of the demand. The Court found that coercive recovery, including garnishee action and adjustment of refunds for other assessment years, could not continue until disposal of the appeal. The revenue was directed to release the recovered amount with interest under section 244A, and no further coercive steps were permitted for the relevant assessment year pending appellate disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
