Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court upheld the assessee's aggregated benchmarking of multiple international transactions under TNMM, accepting the DRP's finding that the transactions were commercially interlinked and should be tested together. Those factual findings were not disturbed by the Tribunal. The Court also applied its earlier ruling in Cummins India Ltd., which recognises that once TNMM is accepted as the most appropriate method, one element cannot be isolated and benchmarked separately if that would distort arm's length determination. As the matter was covered by binding precedent and supported by concurrent findings, no substantial question of law arose and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The High Court upheld the assessee's aggregated benchmarking of multiple international transactions under TNMM, accepting the DRP's finding that the transactions were commercially interlinked and should be tested together. Those factual findings were not disturbed by the Tribunal. The Court also applied its earlier ruling in Cummins India Ltd., which recognises that once TNMM is accepted as the most appropriate method, one element cannot be isolated and benchmarked separately if that would distort arm's length determination. As the matter was covered by binding precedent and supported by concurrent findings, no substantial question of law arose and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.