Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Convertible debentures were held to be entirely equity in nature, since the contractual terms and accounting treatment showed no unilateral obligation to deliver cash and the stray note describing a compound financial instrument could not override substance. Accordingly, no transition amount arose under section 115JB(2C), and the deletion of the MAT adjustment was upheld. The Tribunal also held that the year of convergence governed the character of the instrument for later years, so the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case had to be followed on judicial discipline. For section 14A, the Assessing Officer failed to record the required dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance, making Rule 8D invocation unsustainable; the deletion was upheld.
Convertible debentures were held to be entirely equity in nature, since the contractual terms and accounting treatment showed no unilateral obligation to deliver cash and the stray note describing a compound financial instrument could not override substance. Accordingly, no transition amount arose under section 115JB(2C), and the deletion of the MAT adjustment was upheld. The Tribunal also held that the year of convergence governed the character of the instrument for later years, so the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case had to be followed on judicial discipline. For section 14A, the Assessing Officer failed to record the required dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance, making Rule 8D invocation unsustainable; the deletion was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
