Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Convertible debentures were held to be entirely equity in nature, since the contractual terms and accounting treatment showed no unilateral obligation to deliver cash and the stray note describing a compound financial instrument could not override substance. Accordingly, no transition amount arose under section 115JB(2C), and the deletion of the MAT adjustment was upheld. The Tribunal also held that the year of convergence governed the character of the instrument for later years, so the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case had to be followed on judicial discipline. For section 14A, the Assessing Officer failed to record the required dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance, making Rule 8D invocation unsustainable; the deletion was upheld.
Convertible debentures were held to be entirely equity in nature, since the contractual terms and accounting treatment showed no unilateral obligation to deliver cash and the stray note describing a compound financial instrument could not override substance. Accordingly, no transition amount arose under section 115JB(2C), and the deletion of the MAT adjustment was upheld. The Tribunal also held that the year of convergence governed the character of the instrument for later years, so the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case had to be followed on judicial discipline. For section 14A, the Assessing Officer failed to record the required dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance, making Rule 8D invocation unsustainable; the deletion was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.