Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 50 applies only as a limited deeming fiction for computing capital gains on depreciable assets and does not change the asset's character for all purposes. The Tribunal held that where the asset was held beyond the prescribed period, the resulting gain could be computed under section 50 but remained taxable at the long-term capital gains rate, not as short-term capital gain merely because depreciation had been claimed earlier. It also sustained adoption of the written down value as the cost of acquisition, rejecting indexation from original cost and the separate claim for cost of improvement because no supporting evidence was produced.
Section 50 applies only as a limited deeming fiction for computing capital gains on depreciable assets and does not change the asset's character for all purposes. The Tribunal held that where the asset was held beyond the prescribed period, the resulting gain could be computed under section 50 but remained taxable at the long-term capital gains rate, not as short-term capital gain merely because depreciation had been claimed earlier. It also sustained adoption of the written down value as the cost of acquisition, rejecting indexation from original cost and the separate claim for cost of improvement because no supporting evidence was produced.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.