Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Settlement compensation received for withdrawal of pending suits and complaints was treated as a capital receipt, not taxable as capital gains or business income, because the assessee had only a right to sue and no enforceable property right capable of transfer. The Tribunal held that a right to sue is a personal right, not a capital asset, and compensation for giving it up does not attract section 45. It also noted that the failed acquisition had deprived the assessee of a prospective source of income. The protective addition was deleted because the disputed amount belonged to other corporate parties, had already been received and accounted for by them, and could not be assessed in the assessee's hands.
Settlement compensation received for withdrawal of pending suits and complaints was treated as a capital receipt, not taxable as capital gains or business income, because the assessee had only a right to sue and no enforceable property right capable of transfer. The Tribunal held that a right to sue is a personal right, not a capital asset, and compensation for giving it up does not attract section 45. It also noted that the failed acquisition had deprived the assessee of a prospective source of income. The protective addition was deleted because the disputed amount belonged to other corporate parties, had already been received and accounted for by them, and could not be assessed in the assessee's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
