Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Settlement compensation received for withdrawal of pending suits and complaints was treated as a capital receipt, not taxable as capital gains or business income, because the assessee had only a right to sue and no enforceable property right capable of transfer. The Tribunal held that a right to sue is a personal right, not a capital asset, and compensation for giving it up does not attract section 45. It also noted that the failed acquisition had deprived the assessee of a prospective source of income. The protective addition was deleted because the disputed amount belonged to other corporate parties, had already been received and accounted for by them, and could not be assessed in the assessee's hands.
Settlement compensation received for withdrawal of pending suits and complaints was treated as a capital receipt, not taxable as capital gains or business income, because the assessee had only a right to sue and no enforceable property right capable of transfer. The Tribunal held that a right to sue is a personal right, not a capital asset, and compensation for giving it up does not attract section 45. It also noted that the failed acquisition had deprived the assessee of a prospective source of income. The protective addition was deleted because the disputed amount belonged to other corporate parties, had already been received and accounted for by them, and could not be assessed in the assessee's hands.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
