Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
IBC prevails over electricity law where pre-CIRP dues were not included in an approved resolution plan, because Sections 31 and 238 bind all stakeholders and give the plan finality on a clean slate basis. The Court held that statutory electricity authorities are also bound by the resolution plan, and pre-resolution claims not filed during CIRP stand extinguished by operation of law. Public announcement of CIRP was sufficient notice; separate individual service was not required. The impugned demand notices were quashed insofar as they sought recovery of pre-CIRP dues, while liberty was reserved to raise fresh demands only for lawful post-resolution liability.
IBC prevails over electricity law where pre-CIRP dues were not included in an approved resolution plan, because Sections 31 and 238 bind all stakeholders and give the plan finality on a clean slate basis. The Court held that statutory electricity authorities are also bound by the resolution plan, and pre-resolution claims not filed during CIRP stand extinguished by operation of law. Public announcement of CIRP was sufficient notice; separate individual service was not required. The impugned demand notices were quashed insofar as they sought recovery of pre-CIRP dues, while liberty was reserved to raise fresh demands only for lawful post-resolution liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.