Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
IBC prevails over electricity law where pre-CIRP dues were not included in an approved resolution plan, because Sections 31 and 238 bind all stakeholders and give the plan finality on a clean slate basis. The Court held that statutory electricity authorities are also bound by the resolution plan, and pre-resolution claims not filed during CIRP stand extinguished by operation of law. Public announcement of CIRP was sufficient notice; separate individual service was not required. The impugned demand notices were quashed insofar as they sought recovery of pre-CIRP dues, while liberty was reserved to raise fresh demands only for lawful post-resolution liability.
IBC prevails over electricity law where pre-CIRP dues were not included in an approved resolution plan, because Sections 31 and 238 bind all stakeholders and give the plan finality on a clean slate basis. The Court held that statutory electricity authorities are also bound by the resolution plan, and pre-resolution claims not filed during CIRP stand extinguished by operation of law. Public announcement of CIRP was sufficient notice; separate individual service was not required. The impugned demand notices were quashed insofar as they sought recovery of pre-CIRP dues, while liberty was reserved to raise fresh demands only for lawful post-resolution liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
