Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns may be restored where the taxpayer has furnished pending returns and is ready to clear outstanding statutory dues. The Court followed coordinate Bench decisions and directed the taxpayer to apply for restoration within the stipulated time, while requiring the competent authority to verify the application and proceed in accordance with law under the prescribed procedure in the proviso to Rule 22(4). The cancellation order was not finally examined on merits; instead, restoration was left to the authority's scrutiny and compliance review.
GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns may be restored where the taxpayer has furnished pending returns and is ready to clear outstanding statutory dues. The Court followed coordinate Bench decisions and directed the taxpayer to apply for restoration within the stipulated time, while requiring the competent authority to verify the application and proceed in accordance with law under the prescribed procedure in the proviso to Rule 22(4). The cancellation order was not finally examined on merits; instead, restoration was left to the authority's scrutiny and compliance review.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
