Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that consistency in tax treatment required deletion of the ad hoc disallowance of telephone and car expenses where similar disallowances for earlier years had already been deleted and no material change in facts was shown. It further held that a company's expenditure cannot be treated as personal expenditure merely because employees or directors may use cars or telephones authorised by the company; disallowance is justified only on a finding that the has no nexus with business. The Court found the AO's reasoning cursory and ruled that the company was not required to maintain a log book or split journeys into personal and official use. The disallowance was set aside.
HC held that consistency in tax treatment required deletion of the ad hoc disallowance of telephone and car expenses where similar disallowances for earlier years had already been deleted and no material change in facts was shown. It further held that a company's expenditure cannot be treated as personal expenditure merely because employees or directors may use cars or telephones authorised by the company; disallowance is justified only on a finding that the has no nexus with business. The Court found the AO's reasoning cursory and ruled that the company was not required to maintain a log book or split journeys into personal and official use. The disallowance was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
