Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.