Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.