Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Long-term capital gains on share transactions were accepted as genuine where the assessee produced complete documentary evidence of purchase, amalgamation, dematerialisation, stock exchange sale, STT payment, broker records and banking receipts. The Tribunal held that such direct evidence discharged the burden of proof, and that suspicion, price movement and general human probabilities could not override it without independent inquiry or contrary material linking the assessee to an entry operator or rigging arrangement. As the share sale was treated as genuine, the consequential addition for alleged accommodation-entry commission under section 69C also failed and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.