Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Because the assessee's returned income was below the metro-city monetary threshold in CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011, the reassessment notice under section 148 had to be issued by the ITO and not the ACIT. The Tribunal held that the ACIT lacked jurisdiction under the applicable administrative instruction, so the notice was void ab initio. As the defect went to the authority issuing the notice, the consequential reassessment proceedings were also vitiated and quashed.
Because the assessee's returned income was below the metro-city monetary threshold in CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011, the reassessment notice under section 148 had to be issued by the ITO and not the ACIT. The Tribunal held that the ACIT lacked jurisdiction under the applicable administrative instruction, so the notice was void ab initio. As the defect went to the authority issuing the notice, the consequential reassessment proceedings were also vitiated and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
