Maintainability of a Section 7 insolvency petition against a financial service provider denied; appeal dismissed for non maintainability and complex d...
Provisional attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires exhaustion of statutory remedies; impugned order set aside, appeal to tribuna...
Restoration of property under Prevention of Money Laundering Act after attachment dispute rendered academic; possession directed to successful resolut...
Goods Transport Agency services via e commerce portals: consignment note creates custody and liability and enables exemption for unregistered recipien...
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
