Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
