Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
