Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.