Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Focus Product Scheme incentive received by the assessee was treated as a capital receipt, because the Tribunal followed its co-ordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the immediately succeeding year on identical facts. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the claim accordingly. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee's additional claim ought to have been examined in appeal, and therefore granted relief by accepting the incentive as capital in nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
